For some, the electronic medical record (EMR), the health-mail (DSE) and the medical staff (PHR) mean all different things. For d & 39 others, they are a & 39; l in the same. One thing is for sure - we live in an era in which medicine is irreversible, the technology is a key component for the management of the register, by the practice, and finally, the care of patients. The initiatives of the government and the mandates of donors d & 39; private programs & 39; incentive & 39; pulse is finally on the doctors, not only the electronic submission of the application through their practice management system (PMS), but also the adoption of & 39; electronic patient records systems.
Knowing that you of the implementation of this type of software is one thing to determine which programs are best for you is an entirely different. If you have something, you will find & 39; that there are more than 300 companies, the software for managing surgeries. Digging a little deeper and you will see that & 39; there is another, more than 300 companies, which say they had and EMR solution. To darken, the question before, some offer all-in-one - or single-source solutions, while others & 39; nd & 39; hang in their niche and provide either a match or a & 39; The only solution EMR (best-of-breed). Even if you find that the software vendors are, you have a good reputation and the software you have the choice between a source and a best-of-breed solution.
In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages, from the same source And the creme de la creme of approaches for the recruitment and PMS EMR packages. I will also another option to explore, I ask the full integration approach.
A Single Source EMR Solution
Although PMS, and the two are intended for use in the practice of the doctor himself, they are quite different functions. Software for the management of the practice of most & 39; takes the payroll and for the planning and the EMR packages are on the side clinic - Help for the practitioners, in fact & 39; added, electronically store , the maps of the patient, the administration of the results of tests, X-rays, etc. While the two systems are different people in different job functions, they are both in the administration of the business of the same process: meeting the patient. It is not appropriate for these two programs work together seamlessly, the transmission of information & 39, in both directions, the patient wends its way through a doctor visit? The short answer: Yes, absolutely.
One approach to the procurement of your & 39; PMS EMR programs to work together and to find, a company that sells and supports the programs. Frequently delivered or as a consequence, the only source for these solutions offer the promise d & 39; seamlessly integrates the workflow functions. D & 39; other benefits can only be an agreement to sign and a point of contact for sales, service and support.
While increasingly & 39; companies & 39; announce that one Source solution, there are also drawbacks to this approach. The biggest problem is that the scheduling appointments, billing and collection of money & 39; are completely different activities of the clinic next to the patient encounter. Most companies offer a complete PMS / EMR solution started life as a practice or & 39, a management company of electronic patient records. Therefore, their know-how is almost always heavily on the practice, the administration or the electronic patient records. Rare to find a company that can create the two parties. Accordingly l & 39; buying & 39, a PMS / EMR can continue to run the risk & 39; have to put up with a good package EMR and a bad or wrong practice Package management, or vice versa versa.
It is also interesting that many of the single-source solutions on the market & 39; hui Today, life began when two different applications on the basis of two different companies - were under one roof in the sequence d & 39; an acquisition or a merger & 39;. In examining & 39 d & 39; a single solution, namely when they originally were developed by the same. While some products, which have merged, a good job of integrating d & 39; with each other, it is d & 39; others who do not work, so light that its could.
Best of Breed
Instead A research on the two companies for PMS and EMR software, is another popular l & 39; approach best-of-breed. , Who is the best supplier for each application.
On l & 39; EMR, the clinical requirements of a system can be quite different specialty specialty. For example, the need for dosage regimens and the progress of patients over long periods of a practical Oncology is a totally different than the species, a clinic for general medical need, what distinguishes d & 39; all the more the need d & amp , 39, an orthopaedist. Through this specialization EMR, many procedures have decided to & 39; EMR with a provider, which has a long history and a great deal of experience in their fields. You choose the best for their specialty.
While EMR tends to answer specialties, which in practice usually a little general. Most of the offices have similar requirements for the planning, billing and collection. That does not mean that it & 39; n & 39; is not much better choice to do with the management in practice. There are vast stretches of the cost, complexity and technology. Some systems are designed for physician offices only, while d & 39; others are sold to the very large groups and clinics. In practice for the management of best-of-breed choice was frequently used for the extras: Basics about programming and the billing address, the lightness d & 39; use and the quality of services and support.
The biggest advantage this best - of-breed approach is that you & quot; Re looking for the best products for PMS and EMR. If you have done your homework, you can find products from d & 39; company, the extensive experience in your specialty. The sales and personnel to support more assistance to the best of your practice needs.
One the detriment of the best-of-breed approach might be that you engaged in the practice of management of electronic patient records and the systems that are not consistent with other De l & 39;, which leads to certain tasks, the demographic characteristics of patients input, output and the costs of the proceedings, d & 39; be worthy software duplicated.
Most health nursing homes offers a HL7 interface capabilities to ensure that the data of the patient and for ordering released. Some even offer allocations indictment, and some check-in/out. Interface can afford your products, a great impulse for your practice, but the level of & 39; interfaces of the ink cartridge many & 39; a provider & 39;. Due to the limits, certain products that only a very elementary l & 39; interface could be possible. They want something from duties and to ensure that at least the interfac s the demographic data, from fees and can be transmitted & 39; the EMR back to the settlement PMS integration system.
Full If Model
A third approach for the integration of EMR and PMS can provide that the benefits of both the single-source, and best-of-breed. This approach, which I am following the integration & 39; c & 39; is when best-of-breed PMS EMR vendors and partners to improve their products so & 39; they work in perfect harmony. Many systems have been integrated to provide basic information such as check-in, and the demographic characteristics of the patients are provided by the practice for the administration of the system of & 39; EMR. A deeply integrated solution should include all types of interfaces between functions & 39; more. For example, the deep can be integrated, to achieve the following benefits: Improve
Workflow Management - Going far beyond the issue basic functions, deeply integrated systems can workflow e-mail, tasks, the cost of the procedure and a single number for the connection and authentication & 39;. For example, having a patient, the nurse & 39; practitioners could send a message or a team of & 39; l & 39; EMR screen for the admission PMS screen. Single Source
advantages - like L & 39; buying & 39, a complete system from a single supplier & 39; companies, with the success they can offer their products, many Advantages of the single-source one-stop-shop. In examining & 39; l & 39; purchase of deeply integrated systems, you may have a contact point for sales. The company, the successful partnerships offer can also rationalization of contracts and pricing, which is easier to understand, your total investment.
Best-of-breed advantages - When two companies, as " real " best-of-breed your market with a deeply integrated product, you will benefit from all the advantages of the best-of-breed model and saves many disadvantages. If your selected companies, you have a practice management company that is a complete experience with your specialty. It& 39;s performance in the planning, billing, workflow management office, the collections and more. EMR on the page, do you feel certain that the seller & 39; EMR is a roadmap and to know with proclivities of your specialty. If you call the support service, you even at the best in D & 39; reach the people who l & 39; experience and expertise in your needs.
Conclusion
At this time, the market for & 39; EMR And SPM is still dominated by the stand-alone applications, which may or may not be better in her race. More and more sellers feel under pressure to offer complete solutions from a single source. The companies are in the process of d & 39; acquire d & 39; other companies in the hope & 39; provide comprehensive solutions. D & 39 others opt for the development of the areas, they need to & 39; what they feel is a complete solution. Some companies have understood that the expenditure and the risks in the acquisition and development, and have opted for a partnership with d & 39; other solutions for their products. If you find the companies that joined forces to a comprehensive solution and they are all two best of their breed and are experienced in your field and type of practice, you should consider & 39; go very deep In the integrated solution.
Bookmark it:
No comments:
Post a Comment